<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Simon Chamberlain's library weblog &#187; subject guides</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chamberlain.net.nz/blog/category/subject-guides/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chamberlain.net.nz/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:41:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Subject guides 2.0? One day, maybe&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://chamberlain.net.nz/blog/web-20/subject-guides-20-one-day-maybe/</link>
		<comments>http://chamberlain.net.nz/blog/web-20/subject-guides-20-one-day-maybe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 23:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Chamberlain</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[subject guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chamberlain.net.nz/blog/web-20/subject-guides-20-one-day-maybe/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meredith Farkas has a long, interesting post on her project to develop her library&#8217;s online subject guides:
You could hardly call these things subject guides; they were just a bunch of Web links in different areas. Some were more useful than others. The guide for “science” had three links. In addition, a very high percentage of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meredith Farkas has a long, interesting post on her project to develop her library&#8217;s <a href="http://meredith.wolfwater.com/wordpress/index.php/2007/10/24/the-long-road-towards-subject-guide-20/">online subject guides</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>You could hardly call these things subject guides; they were just a bunch of Web links in different areas. Some were more useful than others. The guide for “science” had three links. In addition, a very high percentage of the links were dead, because it wasn’t anyone’s job to check them.</p></blockquote>
<p>Meredith wanted to develop guides that were easier to update than static webpages. She considered <a href="http://del.icio.us/">del.icio.us</a> (worries about relying on a 3rd party site led her to reject this option),  <a href="http://www.springshare.com/libguides/">LibGuides</a> (a subscription service that looks to have some very useful functionality &#8211; not all needed in her case),  and some open source guides (looked useful, but would her successor be able to maintain the software?). She finally settled on using a wiki, for its flexibility, ability to give colleagues only the rights they need, ability to include student/faculty contributions if desired, searchability, and ability to be assign pages to categories.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also been thinking about the subject guides I maintain. They&#8217;re a fairly long list of static pages. I think the content is reasonably good, but it does take a fair amount of time to check the pages &#8211; URL-rot is still a major problem on the web (which surprises me, I would have thought that most organisations have settled on their site layouts, and wouldn&#8217;t be changing URLs much -but obviously they do &#8211; and don&#8217;t leave re-directs).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still quite interested in the idea of using del.icio.us, while noting Meredith&#8217;s concerns about the effect on our guides if the site went down. The advantages I see are that del.icio.us incorporates tagging, meaning a site can sit in more than one place in the subject guide (sure, I could do that now and manually add a site to several pages, but that gets clumsy and clutters the guide).</p>
<p>The other key advantage, of course, is seeing sites that others have tagged with the same tags that I used. This is maybe less useful when considering more generic tags (&#8220;intellectual property&#8221;, &#8220;human rights&#8221;) but when I looked at very specific tags I could see a real benefit: see my pages tagged <a href="http://del.icio.us/SimonChamberlain/CISG">CISG</a>*, and <a href="http://del.icio.us/tag/CISG">all pages</a> with that tag &#8211; several of which I was unfamiliar with, and which looked useful.</p>
<p>The third advantage would be that faculty or students with del.icio.us accounts could &#8216;friend&#8217; the library&#8217;s account, and each other, and add useful sites to their own accounts, which would then be linked to the original subject guide.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;m quite ready to push this forward yet, but I think it&#8217;s an idea that&#8217;s worth looking at more closely.</p>
<p>*Convention on the International Sale of Goods, an important document in international trade law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chamberlain.net.nz/blog/web-20/subject-guides-20-one-day-maybe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
